So I know that hammers > everything according to gameFAQs, but I think a tier list should include (but not be limited to):

• Overall usefulness through game 
• Obtainability of weapons
• Amount of skill it requires to be good
• Perhaps multiplayer usefulness?
• Matchups against monster (some monster count more, because they are more farmed than others e.g. rathalos)

Taking those things into consideration, perhaps a HR-based tier list? (HR1-3 will get LS love)

Are anyone agreeing with me here? Because the tier lists on gameFAQs are based on percentage alone, and not weapon obtainability, matchups etc.

The point would be to provide players with an easy experience playing through the game, with as little effort possible.

Although MH isn't a game you play to Uca repetitively, which makes the tier list a bit unnecessary